Mcrefs

From stgo
Revision as of 09:53, 13 September 2024 by StefanS (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Marie Curie PDF Proposal Walkability.Data

List of References

  1. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., ... , Zheng, X., 2016. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467.
  2. Adkins, A., Dill, J., Luhr, G., Neal, M., 2012. Unpacking walkability: testing the influence of urban design features on perceptions of walking environment attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design, 17, 499–510.
  3. Anselin, L. (2019/2024) Global Spatial Autocorrelation, in: An Introduction to Spatial Data Science with GeoDa. CRC/Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton. URL https://lanselin.github.io/introbook_vol1/
  4. Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., Alvarez, V., Henao, C. A., 2020. Urban walkability considering pedestrians’ perceptions of the built environment: a 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 183-203.
  5. Bayside City Council, 2015. Bayside Walking Strategy. Victoria, AUS.
  6. Bellizzi, M. G., Forciniti, C., Mazzulla, G., 2021. A stated preference survey for evaluating young pedestrians’ preferences on walkways. Sustainability, 13(22), 12434.
  7. Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., Sallis, J. F., 2009. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4), S99-S123.
  8. Bull and Hardman 2018 Bull, F.C., Hardman, A.E., 2018. Walking: a best buy for public and planetary health. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52, 755–756.
  9. Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Skoufas, A., Zeglis, D., Andronis, C., Basbas, S., 2022. Perceived pedestrian level of service: the case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 124-131.
  10. Clifton, K. J., Smith, A. D. L., Rodriguez, D., 2007. The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2), 95-110.
  11. Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M. and Forsyth, A., 2006. The Irvine–Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), pp.144-152.
  12. De Vos, J., Lättman, K., Van der Vlugt, A. L., Welsch, J., Otsuka, N., 2023. Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: a literature review, conceptual model and research agenda. Transport Reviews, 43(2), 303-324.
  13. Ewing and Handy 2009 Ewing, R., Handy, S., 2009. Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14, 65–84.
  14. Ewing, R., Cervero, R., 2010. Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265–294.
  15. Ferrari, G., Werneck, A. O., Da Silva, D. R., Kovalskys, I., Gómez, G., Rigotti, A., ... , ELANS Study Group, 2020. Is the perceived neighborhood built environment associated with domain-specific physical activity in Latin American adults? An eight-country observational study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17, 1-14.
  16. Forsyth, A., Schmitz, K.H., Oakes, M., Zimmerman, J., Koepp, J., 2006. Standards for environmental measurement using GIS: toward a protocol for protocols. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3, S241–S257.
  17. Frank, L.D., Schmid, T.L., Sallis, J.F., Chapman, J., Saelens, B.E., 2005. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 117–125.
  18. Gebel, K., Bauman, A., Owen, N., 2009. Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 37, 228–238.
  19. Geurs, K.T., van Wee, B., 2004. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transportation Geography, 12, 127–140.
  20. Geurs, K.T., Montis, A., Reggiani, A., 2015. Recent advances and applications in accessibility modelling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 82–85.
  21. Giles-Corti, B., Foster, S., Shilton, T., Falconer, R., 2010. The co-benefits for health of investing in active transportation. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 21, 122–127.
  22. Grekousis, G. (2019) Artificial neural networks and deep learning in urban geography: A T systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 74, 244-256.
  23. Hall, C.M., Ram, Y., 2018. Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review. Transportation Research - Part D: Transp. Environ., 61, 310–324.
  24. Herrmann-Lunecke, M. G., Figueroa-Martínez, C., Parra Huerta, F., Mora, R., 2022. The disabling city: older persons walking in central neighbourhoods of Santiago de Chile. Sustainability, 14(17), 11085.
  25. iRAP, 2024. Star Rating for Schools. Available from: https://starratingforschools.org/
  26. Ito, K., Biljecki, F., 2021. Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision. Transportation Research - Part C: Emerging Technologies, 132, 103371.
  27. Jiron, P., Carrasco, J. A., 2019. Understanding daily mobility strategies through ethnographic, time use, and social network lenses. Sustainability, 12(1), 312.
  28. Lee, E., Dean, J., 2018. Perceptions of walkability and determinants of walking behaviour among urban seniors in Toronto, Canada. Journal of Transport and Health, 9, 309–320.
  29. Lee, S., Talen, E., 2014. Measuring walkability: A note on auditing methods. Journal of Urban Design, 19, 368–388.
  30. Litman, T.A., 2009. Economic Value of Walkability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC.
  31. Litman, T.A., 2013. Transportation and public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 34, 22–1.
  32. Liu, P., Biljecki, F., 2022. A review of spatially-explicit GeoAI applications in urban geography. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 112, 102936.
  33. Livi, A.D., Clifton, K.J., 2004. Issues and methods in capturing pedestrian behaviours, attitudes and perceptions: Experiences with a community based walkability survey, in: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2004.
  34. McGrew Jr, J. C., Monroe, C. B., 2009. An Introduction to Statistical Problem Solving in Geography. Waveland Press.
  35. Merlin, L. A., Jehle, U., 2023. Global interest in walking accessibility: a scoping review. Transport Reviews, 43(5), 1021-1054.
  36. NACTO - Global Designing Cities Initiative & National Association of City Transportation Officials, 2016. Global Street Design Guide. Island Press.
  37. Nag, D., Goswami, A. K., Gupta, A., Sen, J., 2020. Assessing urban sidewalk networks based on three constructs: a synthesis of pedestrian level of service literature. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 204-240.
  38. Pajares, E., Büttner, B., Jehle, U., Nichols, A., Wulfhorst, G., 2021. Accessibility by proximity: Addressing the lack of interactive accessibility instruments for active mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 93, 103080.
  39. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ..., Duchesnay, É., 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825-2830.
  40. Pucher, J., Buehler, R., 2010. Walking and cycling for healthy cities. Built Environment, 36, 391–414.
  41. Ravensbergen, L., Van Liefferinge, M., Isabella, J., Merrina, Z., El-Geneidy, A., 2022. Accessibility by public transport for older adults: a systematic review. Journal of Transport Geography, 103, 103408.
  42. Rdriguez-Valencia, A., Ortiz-Ramirez, H. A., Simancas, W., & Vallejo-Borda, J. A., 2022. Level of pedestrian stress in urban streetscapes. Transportation Research Record, 03611981211072804
  43. Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D., 2003. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 25, 80–91.
  44. Sagaris, L., Tiznado-Aitken, I., Steiniger, S., 2017. Exploring the social and spatial potential of an intermodal approach to transport planning. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11, 721–736.
  45. Sagaris, L. and Tiznado-Aitken, I., 2023. New horizons for sustainable transport planning: An analysis of seven years of gender-related research in Chile. Journal of Transport & Health, 28, p.101544.
  46. Sallis et al. 1998 Sallis, J., Bauman, A., Pratt, M., 1998. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activityaaThis work was prepared for the CIAR Conference on Physical Activity Promotion: An ACSM Specialty Conference. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 379–397.
  47. Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Solsona, D. C., Carrasco, J. A., Neutens, T., 2015. Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 123-135.
  48. Southworth, M., 2005. Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), pp.246-257.
  49. Steiniger, S., Fuentes, C., Flores, D., Castillo, B., Vecchio, G., Walker, J. and Carrasco, J.A., 2022. STRIDE-una aplicación Android para recolectar experiencias de peatones para apoyar a las intervenciones con un foco en la caminabilidad. Estudios de Transporte, 23(2), pp.1-20.
  50. Taczanowska, K., Tansil, D., Wilfer, J. and Jiricka-Pürrer, A., 2024. The impact of age on people's use and perception of urban green spaces and their effect on personal health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic—A case study of the metropolitan area of Vienna, Austria. Cities, 147, p.104798.
  51. Talen, E., Koschinsky, J., 2013. The walkable neighborhood: a literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use Urban Planning, 1, 42–63.
  52. Yang, S. I., Park, S., 2024. Measuring neighborhood walkability: Scope review of recent 20 audit instruments. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 59(2), 5-18.
  53. Vallejo-Borda et al. 2020 Vallejo-Borda, J. A., Cantillo, V., Rodriguez-Valencia, A., 2020. A perception-based cognitive map of the pedestrian perceived quality of service on urban sidewalks. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 107-118.
  54. Vecchio, G., Martens, K., 2021. Accessibility and the capabilities approach: a review of the literature and proposal for conceptual advancements. Transport Reviews, 41(6), 833-854.
  55. Vecchio, G., Tiznado-Aitken, I., Hurtubia, R., 2020a. Transport and equity in Latin America: a critical review of socially oriented accessibility assessments. Transport Reviews, 40(3), 354-381.
  56. Vecchio, G., Castillo, B., Steiniger, S., 2020b. Movilidad urbana y personas mayores en Santiago de Chile: el valor de integrar métodos de análisis, un estudio en el barrio San Eugenio. Revista de Urbanismo, (43), 26-45.
  57. Vecchio, G., Medina, D., Steiniger, S., 2022. Proximidad en la metrópolis que envejece: hacia una clasificación de los barrios de Santiago de Chile basada en la accesibilidad. XLII Congreso Nacional y XXVII Internacional de Geografia, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago de Chile, Chile. (28. November 2022).
  58. Walk21, 2017. The Global Sidewalk Challenge [WWW Document]. URL https://www.walk21.com/sidewalks
  59. Walker, J., Steiniger, S., Canas, C., D'Arcy, L., 2023. Women's perceived walkability at the Luas Tram catchment area in Dublin A data evaluation report using the Walkability.App. Walk21, Cheltenham, UK.
Retrieved from "http://wiki.geosteiniger.cl/mediawiki-1.22.7/index.php?title=Mcrefs&oldid=2367"